{"id":2578,"date":"2022-12-20T11:33:42","date_gmt":"2022-12-20T11:33:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/eastlondon.humanist.org.uk\/?p=2578"},"modified":"2022-12-20T11:33:42","modified_gmt":"2022-12-20T11:33:42","slug":"demeaning-and-dehumanising-the-unacceptable-language-of-the-uks-home-secretary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/eastlondon.humanist.org.uk\/?p=2578","title":{"rendered":"Demeaning and dehumanising. The unacceptable language of the UK&#8217;s Home Secretary"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Home Secretary&#8217;s attempt to dehumanise people for simply seeking a haven is condemned in the Humanist Opinion Column piece Barking and Dagenham Post 17.1.22<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p><span class=\"has-inline-color has-blue-color\">It is deeply worrying that Home Secretary Braverman used the words \u2018invasion\u2019 and \u2018scourge\u2019 when talking about desperate and vulnerable human beings in a recent speech to the House of Commons. It is reminiscent of truly despotic regimes. History tells us that denigrating and unfairly blaming problems on minorities often ends badly.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span class=\"has-inline-color has-blue-color\">\u2018Invasion\u2019 describes what the Russians are doing in Ukraine. And \u2018scourge\u2019 is used to describe pestilence, like plague or rats. \u00a0But it\u2019s a slippery slope when a government minister uses demeaning language to characterise individuals simply seeking a haven. \u00a0We must never forget how Nazis referred to Jews as rats. and Hutus called Tutsis cockroaches during the Rwanda genocide.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span class=\"has-inline-color has-blue-color\">Of course, Braverman didn\u2019t use the word \u2018rats.\u2019 There is more subtlety in these days of \u2018dog whistle\u2019 and \u2018fig leaf\u2019 politics. Articulate politicians are now adept at crafting coded messages to whip up their base, and generally avoid directly transgressing the norms of decent language.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span class=\"has-inline-color has-blue-color\">But Braverman\u2019s words appear carefully chosen to try to divert blame for failed Government policies by stoking animosity towards hapless migrants. They are all generally victims in their own way, whether it be of war, the climate crisis, persecution, or disadvantage in a world of increasing wealth disparity.\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span class=\"has-inline-color has-blue-color\">Language which casts people as less than human can be a smokescreen to excuse inhumane treatment. We hear, for example, of children reduced to sleeping on mats on the floor in crowded insanitary conditions in Kent for weeks following their traumatic journeys. This is unacceptable in a country that calls itself civilised. It is entirely avoidable, and a dereliction of the Home Office\u2019s legal, and moral, duty of care.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span class=\"has-inline-color has-blue-color\">In one infamous comment Braverman talked about \u2018dreaming\u2019 of the first planeload of migrants being sent to Rwanda. The Rwanda policy has been condemned by leading faith groups, and Humanists UK, as cruel. It has so far proved an expensive failure. But even in the unlikely event it \u2018succeeds,\u2019 what sort of mindset describes with relish a process that will bring further heartache and anxiety to individuals forcibly detained and transported?<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><span class=\"has-inline-color has-blue-color\">Migration presents challenging issues. But our response should be rooted in compassion, reason and appreciation that all human life is valuable and deserving of respect, not the language of fear and loathing. <\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Paul Kaufman<br>Chairperson, East London Humanists. <br>17.11.22<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Home Secretary&#8217;s attempt to dehumanise people for simply seeking a haven is condemned in the Humanist Opinion Column piece Barking and Dagenham Post 17.1.22<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9c4oP-FA","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/eastlondon.humanist.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2578"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/eastlondon.humanist.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/eastlondon.humanist.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eastlondon.humanist.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eastlondon.humanist.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2578"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/eastlondon.humanist.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2579,"href":"http:\/\/eastlondon.humanist.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2578\/revisions\/2579"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/eastlondon.humanist.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eastlondon.humanist.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eastlondon.humanist.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}